Anonymous Asked:
Excuse me, but no. By your logic, we should get rid of those slightly inconvenient 10 seconds of the "viewer discretion is advised" warning for graphic shows simply because someone who would be triggered by it could just as easily end up seeing it by flipping channels. Tagging triggers literally only takes like 5 seconds of your time because Tumblr remembers tags; it's not hurting your enjoyment or stopping you from reblogging what you want.

kato-ren:

Alright, this is the biggest load of bullshit I’ve ever read. 
“Excuse me, but no. By your logic, we should get rid of those slightly inconvenient 10 seconds of the "viewer discretion is advised” warning for graphic shows simply because someone who would be triggered by it could just as easily end up seeing it by flipping channels.“

Literally… Wow. 

How the Hell did you even get ANY of that from what I said. Now this is just getting so stupid it’s annoying me. 

Stop whining about crap I didn’t even mention. Stop TRYING to make people out to be villains and jerks because they’re not agreeing to how YOU feel. 
Seriously. YOUR logic is flawed. You’re bringing up something that I didn’t even talk about. 
I, nor anyone else, is responsible for knowing and preventing EVERY PERSON’S TRIGGERS. 

Also, this isn’t about TAGS. It was NEVER about tags. It was about people BULLYING people into submitting to what THEY want, even when there is no actual reason other than one person being uncomfortable. 
Someone pitching a fit because someone said no on their own personal blog about something that wasn’t even an issue. 
Read the whole situation before you come posting crap like this. 

Dear lord, SJW anons need to learn to fucking read. It was about a user complaining over some small thing to force kato to do something they originally said no to. There was nothing major about tagging or personal triggers by OP.

  1. rottencanines reblogged this from kato-ren
  2. swiftyuki reblogged this from kato-ren
  3. kato-ren posted this